Anita Desoso Criticises ‘Token’ Appointment, Questions GH¢500 Allowance And Unknown Board Members
Former National Vice Chairperson of the National Democratic Congress, Anita Desoso, has expressed frustration over what she describes as a “token” appointment, raising concerns about the circumstances surrounding her placement on a government board.
Speaking publicly about the issue, Desoso disclosed that she was surprised to receive only GH¢500 as an allowance after attending a meeting connected to the appointment. She explained that she arrived late for the meeting and was later called to attend, but the amount given to her afterward left her disappointed.
According to her, the situation made her question the seriousness of the appointment. She indicated that the payment appeared insignificant considering the responsibilities expected from members serving on such boards.
Desoso also raised concerns about the individuals she encountered during the meeting. She claimed that several of the people present were unfamiliar to her, describing them as “strangers.” This development, she suggested, raised questions about how some individuals were selected for positions on the board.
The veteran NDC figure said the experience made her uncomfortable and initially made her consider withdrawing from the role. However, she explained that her loyalty and commitment to the party prevented her from stepping away from the appointment entirely.
Her comments have sparked discussions about transparency and fairness in the appointment of individuals to public boards. Some political observers believe her remarks highlight concerns within political circles about how certain positions are allocated.
Desoso further hinted at allegations circulating within political circles that some appointments may have been influenced by factors other than merit. She suggested that such practices could create dissatisfaction among grassroots supporters who expect opportunities to be distributed fairly.
The outspoken politician emphasized that people who dedicate years of service to a political party should be treated with respect and not sidelined in favour of individuals who may not have contributed significantly to the party’s growth.
Her remarks have since generated debate among party supporters and political commentators, with many calling for greater transparency in government appointments and board selections.
