Paris Jackson has raised fresh concerns over how her late father Michael Jackson’s estate is being managed, filing new legal objections that question the actions and decisions of the estate’s executors. The latest court documents signal growing frustration from the singer and actress, who is one of the primary beneficiaries of the legendary performer’s estate.
In the filing, Paris alleges that the executors have failed to properly manage estate assets, particularly large sums of money that have reportedly been left in cash rather than invested to generate better returns. She argues that this approach has limited the estate’s growth and does not reflect responsible financial stewardship. The documents also raise concerns about what Paris describes as excessive legal expenses, with millions allegedly paid to lawyers over several years without clear explanations or detailed breakdowns.
Paris further claims that the compensation received by the executors has been disproportionately high compared to distributions made to beneficiaries. According to her objections, the estate’s leadership appears to prioritize their own financial interests instead of focusing on long term preservation of Michael Jackson’s legacy and fair treatment of his heirs. She also questions certain business ventures associated with the estate, suggesting that some projects may carry unnecessary financial risk.
These new objections follow a recent legal setback for Paris, after a judge dismissed parts of an earlier petition and ordered her to cover some legal costs. Despite that ruling, she has continued to pursue greater transparency and accountability, insisting that her actions are motivated by concern for her father’s legacy rather than personal gain.
Representatives linked to the estate have pushed back against the claims, stating that the estate has been successfully rebuilt from significant debt into a highly valuable enterprise. They maintain that beneficiaries, including Paris, have already received substantial financial support and that all decisions have been made in accordance with the law.
As the dispute continues, the case highlights ongoing tensions within the Jackson family and renews public attention on the complex management of one of the most valuable music estates in the world. Further court proceedings are expected as both sides stand by their positions.
