The committee set up by the National Democratic Congress to investigate allegations of vote-buying in the Ayawaso East parliamentary primaries has explained why it was unable to annul the results of the election. The explanation comes as debate continues within the party over how to handle disputed primaries and allegations of misconduct.
The committee was tasked with examining claims that delegates were offered inducements during the February 7 primary that selected a candidate to represent the NDC in the upcoming Ayawaso East by-election. Supporters of the annulment said that irregularities, including alleged distribution of items to influence voting, called into question the credibility of the process.
In its report, the committee said that despite receiving evidence and testimonies related to the claims, it did not find conclusive proof that the alleged inducements directly affected the outcome of the primary election. The panel stressed that for an annulment to be justified, clear and verifiable evidence must show that the election’s integrity was compromised beyond reasonable doubt.
Members of the committee explained that while there were indications of isolated incidents and complaints from some delegates, these did not reach the threshold necessary to overturn the declared results. The group said it reviewed statements, inspected available documentation, and interviewed relevant stakeholders, but the evidence fell short of proving systemic vote-buying that would invalidate the election.
The inability to annul the primary has drawn mixed reactions. Some party members have expressed disappointment, calling for stronger internal mechanisms to ensure electoral integrity during primaries. Others have welcomed the committee’s work, saying adherence to due process is essential to prevent arbitrary decisions that could weaken party structures.
The NDC is now focusing on preparations for the Ayawaso East by-election scheduled for March 3, with party leadership encouraging unity and continued engagement among all factions. Leaders have reiterated the importance of resolving grievances through established channels and strengthening internal rules to prevent similar controversies in future primaries.
