A Ghanaian historian has shared his perspective on the growing national discussion about whether Kotoka International Airport should be renamed amid renewed public interest and political debate. His remarks urge a focus on what the conversation could teach Ghanaians rather than just the financial cost or political divide surrounding the issue.
The debate over renaming the airport has gained traction after government officials and some political leaders suggested changing the name back to Accra International Airport, the title the facility originally held when it was opened in 1958 under then-President Dr. Kwame Nkrumah. The airport was given its current name in 1969 in honour of Lieutenant General Emmanuel Kwasi Kotoka, a military figure involved in the 1966 coup that ousted Nkrumah’s government.
In his comments, the historian said the controversy presents an opportunity for deeper public education about Ghana’s history, arguing that the focus should go beyond cost estimates or political point-scoring. He believes the conversation can help citizens understand why national symbols are significant and how they reflect cultural values, heritage, and collective memory.
Supporters of the renaming argue that returning the airport to its original name or choosing a new one that resonates with Ghana’s democratic ideals aligns with broader efforts to redefine national identity. Opponents caution that the debate could trigger division if it becomes overly politicised or neglects inclusive consultation.
The historian called on both policymakers and the public to engage thoughtfully with the issue, using it as a platform to learn more about pivotal moments in Ghana’s past and the stories behind public landmarks. By framing the discussion as educational rather than purely symbolic or political, he said, Ghanaians stand to gain a richer appreciation of their shared heritage.
As the conversation continues across media and civil society, many voices have joined in, each highlighting different facets of the renaming question — from historical culpability and national pride to economic cost and cultural significance.
